As I watch the special election campaign unfold in Oregon’s First Congressional District—the seat I captured for Democrats for the first time 38 years ago—I think of advice the iconic Senator Wayne Morse gave me in my first race in 1974.
In the darkness of his car at the end of a long day of campaigning, the old warhorse tapped me on the knee and said:
“Young man, always remember who you are and what you’re willing to lose an election for! The one who cannot will do anything to win. And that’s a dangerous man (sic)—because he will always put politics above principle and self above country.”
The reason the memory returns is that the Wayne Morse standard so perfectly distinguishes the Democrat in this race, Suzanne Bonamici, from her contortionist Republican challenger, Rob Cornilles. Bonamici is an unapologetic Democrat who will put government back on our side—to create “trickle up” policies, to protect the environment, to safeguard Medicare, to stop wars of choice rather than necessity, and to make the very rich pay a fair share of taxes to help reduce the deficit.
Her weather vane Republican challenger is posing as a moderate, for this season at least, because he knows it’s the only way he has a chance against Suzanne, a former Federal Trade Commission lawyer and state legislative star. So he talks about a flat tax when only 16 months ago—in a different political season—he supported the Bush tax cuts that added $2.5 trillion to the deficit to benefit the 1%.
Bonamici has explicit ideas for cutting the budget deficit: cancel Bush tax cuts for millionaires, bring the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan and close loopholes for established industries like Big Oil.
Cornilles? His plan is to—ta da!—pass a Constitutional amendment to outlaw that darned red ink. Of course, he was instantly criticized because ratification of the amendment as part of the basic law of the land would in all probability force higher taxes and draconian cuts in the Pentagon. But wait! There seems to be no problem that Cornilles can’t solve with pixie dust; thus, he now says enforcement of the Constitutional no-no, once passed, (I’m writing this through tears of laughter!) would have to be “phased in” so as not to be too sudden of a jolt to taxpayers or the generals and admirals.
The differences go on: Bonamici, the steady adult, protected consumers as a lawyer with the Federal Trade Commission; Cornilles, the artful dodger, exploited his workers by failing to pay his share of their payroll tax, for which the government slapped him with a $83,000 federal lien. Bonamici will protect Social Security and Medicare; Cornilles told the Daily Astorian (January 2010) that he would cut those programs before he’d cut the Pentagon budget. That was before he said he’d save them with “reforms” he refuses disclose but sound like “optional privatization” to me.
The January 31 election should be a no-brainer. But it will have implications far beyond my former congressional district. As that day’s only federal election, pundits and prognosticators from across the country are ready to declare the outcome a national omen.
I agree, and trust me on this: should Cornilles win, he’ll bask in the warm embrace of House Speaker John Boehner and his Tea Party obstructionists as they use the election as a mandate to step up their war against the middle class, the environment, civil liberties, and safe abortions. (But the way, on abortion, the Artful Dodger wants us to believe that abortion is an issue in which the House “has a very limited role to play.” Which is sort of a surprise to me because, well, I could swear I spent hours in debate on the House floor, protecting women’s reproductive freedoms against Henry Hyde and his anti-choice acolytes. If elected, given his bobbing and weaving, where do you suppose Rob Cornilles would land?)
A Bonamici victory, on the other hand, will be an unmistakable call to stop the rise of Republican Religious Ayatollahs and Wall Street flimflam artists who almost destroyed the U.S. banking system and created our current economic mess.
With the memory of Wayne Morse as my witness, I assure you that Suzanne Bonamici is the only candidate in this race who puts “principle above politics.”
Disclosure: 14 months ago, my wife and I moved to Bozeman, Montana to spend our remaining good years close to our granddaughters. But having started the Democrats’ 38-year hold on Oregon’s First District, I have one last duty to my former constituents—to help Suzanne Bonamici give them the representation they deserve.

January 17th, 2012 at 12:37 pm
Good for you Les. Helping the right candidate is very important for former members of Congress
January 17th, 2012 at 12:41 pm
You’re living proof, my friend. Living proof.
January 17th, 2012 at 1:06 pm
Although I have lived in Illinois for most of my adult life, I was born and reared in Oregon and plan to retire there one of these days. Thanks for spending your retirement paying attention to Oregon so that the rest of us can listen and learn!
January 17th, 2012 at 1:08 pm
Oregon’s still a special place, Elizabeth. I will always feel like an Oregonian wandering around under the Big Sky …
January 17th, 2012 at 1:33 pm
I was just reminded by a classmate that when she and I were both students at Pacific University, back in the late 60′s – early 70′s, you frequently visited campus and talked with students. So thanks also for making yourself accessible to our alma mater back then. Those were great times study political science!
January 17th, 2012 at 5:20 pm
My comment should read “great times to study” – guess I should proof read more thoroughly – but I was not an English major!
January 17th, 2012 at 5:23 pm
LOL! Elizabeth, I read your kind remarks and blew right past the typo. Which makes me no editor! I had meant to mention earlier how pleased I am that you and your classmate remembered my lecturing at Pacific so many years ago. I enjoyed doing it very much. It’s good that it is remembered. All best to you.
January 17th, 2012 at 2:29 pm
Excellent article, Les. You make it obvious that Bonamici is the best choice for Oregon.
I’m pleased that you found my article useful in preparing this.
January 17th, 2012 at 2:36 pm
Thanks. Your piece was terrific.
January 17th, 2012 at 5:18 pm
Wayne would be proud of you Les…..as you do walk your talk!
January 17th, 2012 at 5:19 pm
Thom, your words mean a lot to me. Thanks so much.
January 17th, 2012 at 8:28 pm
Applause.
January 22nd, 2012 at 8:48 pm
We remember you for your work in the public information office in Marsh Hall as well as the classroom and pathways among the old oak trees.I can remember when Wayne Morse spoke on campus about the war and I was so moved!! This is the Pacific I love to remember….
January 22nd, 2012 at 8:55 pm
What a memory, Janet. I remember it still. Thanks.
January 22nd, 2012 at 9:00 pm
Truer words were never written! Thanks, Les.
January 22nd, 2012 at 9:29 pm
I had not heard that Cornilles figures that a balanced budget amendment — part of the Constitution — could be “phased in.” That alone says a lot. And of course you are right: The outcome will be significant symbolically (although I think more so if RC should win, given that the district is Democratic now).
January 22nd, 2012 at 10:48 pm
Exactly, Dan.